How Really does Debate Settlement System of WTO Work?

 How Really does Debate Settlement System of WTO Work?

The dispute settlement procedures used by the World Trade Organization (WTO) are based on the GATT 1947 dispute settlement rules, which have been in place for nearly 50 years. Finding a positive solution to the dispute is the fundamental goal of this dispute resolution method. Because Vietnam is a member of the World Trade Organization, it may use the WTO's dispute settlement mechanism in disputes with other WTO members.

The parties to a dispute at the World Trade Organization (WTO) will first hold consultations to come up with a mutually agreed-upon solution to the dispute (Consultation – the stage of mediation). Third parties, who are members with a significant interest and desire to participate in the dispute resolution process, may participate in each case if they feel they have a significant interest in the case and should be considered by the panel. On account of a fruitless request, a board of 3 to 5 individuals will be laid out and entrusted with looking at a specific issue in debate based on WTO rules refered to by the petitioner's country.

According to Article 12.3 of the DSU, the first thing a panel to review the complaint must do is establish a timetable for its proceedings. The contents of Article 12 and Annex 3 of the DSU are typically covered by the panel procedure, which allows for some flexibility to guarantee the quality of the report without delaying the proceedings. The parties can be more proactive in presenting evidence, bases, and arguments in their submitted documents by understanding the contents and deadlines of a timetable.

The panel will enter the internal discussion phase (deliberation) following the hearings to evaluate the assessment of relevant legal and practical issues in accordance with WTO regulations. The deliberation must be kept secret. The parties to the dispute were not present when these reports were written; rather, they were written based solely on the information that was provided and the remarks that were made earlier. Individual assessments of hearers introduced in a board report will exclude the names of speakers of such sentiments.

Within two weeks of the panel's conclusion of the mid-term review, the final report will be sent to the dispute parties. Regularly, every report of the board has extremely huge substance, to work with the investigation of audit by the redrafting body and to cite case regulation, the report should show the chapter by chapter list and sections which are discrete numbered in the request for the report. After the DSB adopts a panel report, the dispute resolution process will immediately proceed to the implementation stage if there is no appeal. The case will be reviewed at the appellate level if there is an appeal.

As a member of the World Trade Organization, Vietnam must be well-versed in the dispute resolution process and fully prepared for disputes with other WTO members in international trade disputes.

ANT Lawyers have Litigation and Dispute lawyers inHanoi, Da Nang and Ho Chi Minh City that help clients dealing with dispute resolution and alternative dispute resolution in Vietnam.

Read More

How Dispute Lawyers in Hanoi Could Help?

 How Dispute Lawyers in Hanoi Could Help?

ANT Lawyers – A law firm in Vietnam, could assist clients on dispute resolution matters throughout Vietnam.

We have dispute lawyers in Hanoi who are qualified and have experience helping clients resolve disputes in Vietnam.

We have represented clients in disputes involving a variety of industries, including disputes involving international trade, commercial transactions, partnership or shareholder agreements, property sales and purchases, real estate, intellectual property, banking and finance, and maritime matters.

We are able to provide our clients with appropriate and adaptable solutions to their problems thanks to our knowledge, experience, and comprehension of Vietnamese culture. Our dispute lawyers in Hanoi also help clients through the various stages of litigation at Vietnam's national or provincial courts, arbitration centers, and courts of appeal.

Our dispute attorneys in Hanoi are well-trained and certified internationally in the US and EU, and they have adapted their skills to Vietnamese cultures to assist clients in resolving conflicts without a formal proceeding in order to save money, time, and maintain the relationship between the disputed parties. If it is at all possible, we recommend alternative dispute resolution, such as mediation.

Our dispute resolution practice at ANT Lawyers helps our clients with the following:

Negotiation: reviewing relevant contracts and documents, advising possible courses of action and negotiating with relevant parties before initiating the legal proceeding.

Litigation and legal representation: representing clients before Vietnamese courts and other Vietnamese authorities.

Arbitration: advising on choice of arbitration, drafting arbitration clause, and representing clients for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.

Alternative proceedings: certain alternatives may be available for dispute resolution in Vietnam.

ANT Lawyers have litigation and dispute lawyers in Hanoi, that help clients dealing with dispute resolution and alternative dispute resolution in Vietnam.

Read More

How to Resolve Disputes Settlement through Arbitration in Vietnam?

 How to Resolve Disputes Settlement through Arbitration in Vietnam?

Arbitration, mediation, negotiation, and litigation are all methods of dispute resolution. In order to resolve disputes, a litigation dispute law firm in Vietnam needs dispute lawyers who have the expertise and experience necessary to resolve complex cross-border, commercial, and civil disputes.

Most business agreements could include a provision stating that disputes must be resolved through arbitration in the current business environment. A valid written arbitration agreement, either as an arbitration clause in a contract or a separate agreement, is required for a dispute to be referred to arbitration. The arbitration clause is treated as independent if it is included in a contract, and the arbitration clause's validity is unaffected by contract modifications, extensions, or terminations. As long as the parties clearly state their intention to resolve any dispute through arbitration, Vietnamese law permits a written arbitration agreement to take any form. The residing court is required to drop the case if a dispute falls within the scope of a valid arbitration agreement and a party attempts to initiate court proceedings. Additionally, the arbitration organization authorized to resolve disputes without supplemental agreement is not required to be specified in an arbitration agreement. Even if there is a valid arbitration agreement, the Vietnamese Arbitration Law states that a dispute must also fall into one of three categories before it can be arbitrated:

(1) disputes arising from “commercial activities”;

(2) disputes where at least one party is engaged in commercial activities;

(3) other disputes where the law stipulates that arbitration is a permissible means of resolution.

The definition of the term "commercial activity" in category (1) can be found in Commercial Law No. “activity for profit-making purposes comprising the purchase and sale of goods, provision of services, investment, commercial enhancement, and other activities for profit-making purposes,” according to 36-2005-QH11 (31 December 2005). Noncommercial disputes, such as civil disputes, in which at least one party is engaged in commercial activities, frequently fall into the second category. However, disputes between consumers and providers of goods or services do not fall under this category. The law stipulates that the party may select arbitration or litigation in this instance. The dispute cannot be arbitrated without the consent of the consumer, even if the agreement includes a standard arbitration clause in the contract for the supply of goods or services. Legislators have complete discretion over whether or not to expand or maintain the categories of disputes that can be resolved through arbitration. A dispute arising from investment activities governed by the Law on Investment is an illustration of a dispute in category (3).

Due to the fact that many businesses would rather avoid the high costs of litigation, arbitration has grown in popularity.

Arbitration lawyers in Vietnam at ANT Lawyers - a Vietnam law firm with accreditation in national and international arbitration practice can assist in providing clients with legal advice and guidance throughout the process of resolving disputes. The intervention attorneys could likewise exhort the clients on different issues from decision of authority, decision of assertion rules, specially appointed or institutional discretion, spot of mediation, implementation of arbitral honor.

Read More

Trade and Customs in Vietnam

 Navigating the modern environment of international business requires companies that engage in the exchange of goods and services across international borders to be ever vigilant in addressing customs and import controls laws, including those related to border and supply chain security. ANT Lawyers trade and customs practice works to ensure and optimize our clients’ cost- and time-efficient shipment of goods and services across borders, within the confines of the law.

Customs Lawyers in Vietnam

We represent clients who engage in such diverse fields as:

-Customs brokerage, express delivery, freight forwarding, logistics and sea and rail transportation

-Apparel, beverages, consumer electronics, cosmetics, food products, footwear, home furnishings, luxury goods and paper products.

Businesses often overlook the fundamental importance of accurate tariff classification and appraisement as sources of potential duty savings and necessary compliance for imported products. These are the “nuts and bolts” of any sophisticated customs and import controls practice, and our Customs lawyers in Vietnam are well versed in this complex body of law to maximize duty savings and minimize customs penalties.

ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam with customs lawyers in Vietnam always follow up customs cases and its development to update clients on regular basis.

Source: ANT Lawyers.vn

Read More

How to Distinguish between Deposit and Advance Payment?

In commercial transactions, it is very common for one party to give the other party an amount of money before the contract being performed. Should this amount be considered as deposit or advance payment?

How to Distinguish between Deposit and Advance Payment

 Deposit is one of security measures for the performance of contract obligations. According to regulation of Civil Code 2015, deposit is an act whereby one party (hereinafter referred to as the depositor) gives to other party (hereinafter referred to as the depositary) a sum of money or precious metals, gemstones or other valuable things (hereinafter referred to as the deposited property) for a period of time as security for the entering into or performance of a contract.

Upon a contract being entered into or performed, any deposited property shall be returned to the depositor, or deducted from the amount of payment obligation. If the depositor refuses to enter into or perform the contract, the deposited property shall belong to the depositary. In case the depositary refuses to enter into or perform the contract, the depositary must return the deposited property and pay an amount equivalent to the value of the deposited property to the depositor, unless otherwise agreed.

It can be seen that the purpose of deposit is to ensure the entering into or performance of a contract. Due to the fact that its nature is a security measure for the performance of contract obligations, sanction is set in regulation of deposit in case one party refuses to perform the agreement.

In practice, the advance payment can be understood that the obligor pays the obligee a sum of money in advance and this amount is regarded as in-advance performance of a payment obligation. As the nature of the advance is not a security measure for the performance of contract obligations, there is no fine rising from the advance if one party refuses to perform the agreement. Further, when a contracting party gives to the other party a sum of money, which is not clearly identified by the parties as a deposit or an advance, such amount shall be considered an advance payment.

It is important to distinguish the difference between deposit and advance payment to avoid potential disputes in performance the contract or consult with dispute resolution lawyers in Vietnam at early stage of the dispute for proper actions.

ANT Lawyers, as a reliable law firm in Vietnam, we focus on providing possible solutions that best meet the needs of legal and business clients. We help customers achieve their goals while protecting their interests, minimizing risks, and complying with the law.

Read More